Re: Mulinux version 11r12 install bug

From: Clive Wright ([email protected])
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 00:30:36 CEST


Michele Andreoli wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:42:03PM +0100, Clive Wright nicely wrote:
> > >
> > Strange!
> > There is no BOOT.raw in the mulinux-11r12.tgz I downloaded
> > from sunsite.dk.
>
> This is norm. I only publish BOOT: BOOT.raw is build on the fly by
> "mu -r". BOOT contains LILO; BOOT.raw doesn't.
>
> > Also:
> >
> > dd if=BOOT bs=512 count=1 |hexdump
> > 1+0 records in
> > 1+0 records out
> > 0000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
> > *
> > 0000200
> >
> > That is no lilo in BOOT file.
> > Could there be two different versions of mulinux-11r12.tgz
> > on the server??
> >
>
> There some check:
>
> # ls -l BOOT
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 575488 Mar 25 10:59 BOOT
>
> # md5sum BOOT
> 25f754c8cb4ecc1cbff45a38dc7c7b76 BOOT
>
> # md5sum mulinux-11r12.tgz
> 95775bbfc2b6cb5dd1da8564ac08c171 mulinux-11r12.tgz
>
> #ls -l mulinux-11r12.tgz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1950508 Apr 2 13:52 mulinux-11r12.tgz
>
> Michele
>
$ ls -l BOOT
-rw-r--r-- 1 clive users 575488 Mar 25 08:28 BOOT

$ md5sum BOOT
6300b67a38b0efe6e4b01250b593c804 BOOT

$ md5sum ../mulinux-11r12.tgz
abfadb46c2e52f707b5e8f7789b520c0 ../mulinux-11r12.tgz
 
$ ls -l ../mulinux-11r12.tgz
-rw-r----- 1 clive users 1949038 Mar 28 19:34
../mulinux-11r12.tgz

It appears that the version I downloaded from:
http://sunsite.dk/mulinux/mu/current/ at 1916 on 28th March
2001 is a different tarball to the one you have.

Clive

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:18 CET